black4rob2
11-11-2004, 02:17 PM
I know about the college ball that will come down here, but what I am saying is that the deal would have worked out better for everyone had the Nets been involved in the final stages of the Arena Project.
1: The Nets probably would have stayed in tack due to the fact that the Rat king (Ratner) would not have ownership of the team. Had the Nets had a buyer who was willing to keep them in Jersey...They would have definitely move to Newark and more than likely keep the team as is. The rat king is trying to save overhead cost so that he can continue and build his empire of a real estate business. He knows nothing about basketball and that's what pissed me off. Also, what I don't get is how can you make all of these basketball and team decisions if you haven't paid for the team yet.. (That's another topic).
2: The city would have benefited, because The Nets could have split some of the cost that the city has to now endure. Sure the nets bottom line in several years have shown red, but so has the devils. Let's face it...but this is a basketball and football area. When was the last time you saw a brother wearing a Broduer Jersey (How many people on this forum knows who that is). The amount of revenue would have easily doubled if the basketball market was fulfilled.
3: The property owners in Brooklyn would have been happy as well...They are going through the same thing the Mulberry St. folks will soon go through as far as eminent domain is concerned. They don't want a staduim taking away their caribbean resturants and shops...its not like their bringing in soccer.
Personally, I just think that bringing in a professional baskeball team to Newark would have made the deal that much more appealing to a lot of people and for many individual reasons. The Nets could have been a great commadity to this state and especially this city.
1: The Nets probably would have stayed in tack due to the fact that the Rat king (Ratner) would not have ownership of the team. Had the Nets had a buyer who was willing to keep them in Jersey...They would have definitely move to Newark and more than likely keep the team as is. The rat king is trying to save overhead cost so that he can continue and build his empire of a real estate business. He knows nothing about basketball and that's what pissed me off. Also, what I don't get is how can you make all of these basketball and team decisions if you haven't paid for the team yet.. (That's another topic).
2: The city would have benefited, because The Nets could have split some of the cost that the city has to now endure. Sure the nets bottom line in several years have shown red, but so has the devils. Let's face it...but this is a basketball and football area. When was the last time you saw a brother wearing a Broduer Jersey (How many people on this forum knows who that is). The amount of revenue would have easily doubled if the basketball market was fulfilled.
3: The property owners in Brooklyn would have been happy as well...They are going through the same thing the Mulberry St. folks will soon go through as far as eminent domain is concerned. They don't want a staduim taking away their caribbean resturants and shops...its not like their bringing in soccer.
Personally, I just think that bringing in a professional baskeball team to Newark would have made the deal that much more appealing to a lot of people and for many individual reasons. The Nets could have been a great commadity to this state and especially this city.