PDA

View Full Version : Feds subpoena Statehouse records in Sharpe James probe


Octavia
07-03-2007, 06:55 PM
by Ted Sherman
Tuesday July 03, 2007, 6:39 PM



Federal investigators have subpoenaed Statehouse records tied to controversial legislation sponsored three years ago by former Newark Mayor Sharpe James that gave him unbridled power in city land sales.


James, who is under investigation over cut-rate deals of surplus municipal real estate to politically-connected friends and associates, pushed for the change in state law after a court rebuffed his challenge to the city council's bid to unilaterally give land to a Hispanic non-profit group.

At the time, ranking Democrats said James, in his role as a state senator, had threatened to hold up the budget if the bill was not passed. Introduced in February 2004, it became law the following July.

The subpoena to the Senate -- a copy of which was obtained by The Star-Ledger -- seeks all documents and communications related to Senate Bill S-967, as well as any correspondence from the two primary sponsors of the legislation, James and the late Jersey City Mayor Glenn Cunningham.

The U.S. Attorney's office would not discuss the matter. Calls to James and his lawyer, Raymond Brown Jr., were not returned yesterday.


The grand jury subpoena, dated June 28, came just a day after the Associated Press reported that James was denying responsibility for the cut-rate city land deals now being investigated by the U.S. Attorney's Office.

In a two-page handwritten letter to the AP, James invoked the Faulkner Act -- the 1950 law layout out powers for mayors -- in claiming that he never had the authority to broker land deals or set prices by himself.

"The mayor is not a boss or a lord or can give away municipal land," he wrote. "Only the Council set prices, only the Council meet and interview developers, only the Council can convey land to developers."

But in 2004 the former mayor took steps to give himself a major role in the sales of city land, when he pushed to amend the law solely as it affected Newark.

The bill he sponsored as a senator mandated that the city council could not convey property unless first presented to the council by the mayor, "recognizing the authority of the mayor, as the chief executive officer of the municipality, to initiate those land purchase and sales decisions and determine the terms and conditions for acquisition and sale." The change only covered municipalities with populations of 265,000 or more as of the last Census (only Newark qualified.)

The current federal investigation into the former mayor's dealings started after The Star-Ledger reported last summer that James used two city-issued credit cards to pay for trips to Brazil, Puerto Rico, and elsewhere.

The investigation later expanded to focus on Newark real estate deals, following the discovery that one of James' travel companions, a publicist named Tamika Riley, made hundreds of thousands of dollars buying cheap property from the city of Newark and reselling it, sometimes after just weeks.

John360
07-03-2007, 11:37 PM
The bill he sponsored as a senator mandated that the city council could not convey property unless first presented to the council by the mayor, "recognizing the authority of the mayor, as the chief executive officer of the municipality, to initiate those land purchase and sales decisions and determine the terms and conditions for acquisition and sale." The change only covered municipalities with populations of 265,000 or more as of the last Census (only Newark qualified.)


Ha-ha...hoisted on his own petard!! :D

OneEyeOpen
07-05-2007, 02:47 AM
Ha-ha...hoisted on his own petard!! :D

It's hard to debate facts with rhetoric, and let's face it, they were never very good at it.

RealVest
07-05-2007, 02:56 AM
Collecting information is great, but it doesnt mean anything unless they prove he did something wrong. Getting something mandated is still getting something mandated. A legal process that allows politicians in powerful positions to change how political business is done.

The only thing that they can try and get on him is that he benefitted personally from such transactions and/or he did something fishy when it comes to passing such legislation. This is probably going to be more than the alledged "threats" to hold up the budget.

Everyone can debate this 24-7 but the chips will fall as the weeks come.

OneEyeOpen
07-05-2007, 03:00 AM
Collecting information is great, but it doesnt mean anything unless they prove he did something wrong. Getting something mandated is still getting something mandated. A legal process that allows politicians in powerful positions to change how political business is done.

The only thing that they can try and get on him is that he benefitted personally from such transactions and/or he did something fishy when it comes to passing such legislation. This is probably going to be more than the alledged "threats" to hold up the budget.

Everyone can debate this 24-7 but the chips will fall as the weeks come.

Just follow the paper, the strategy in there.

J. Sharpe James, J.D.
07-05-2007, 03:36 AM
The "Strategy" is in the Paper?

It is. Publically tarnish Sharpe's legacy with innuendos and rumours, while trying to make LEGAL transactions suspect. I guess the entire NJ Legislature was DUPED by Sharpe's scams.

OneEyeOpen
07-05-2007, 04:38 AM
The "Strategy" is in the Paper?

It is. Publically tarnish Sharpe's legacy with innuendos and rumours, while trying to make LEGAL transactions suspect. I guess the entire NJ Legislature was DUPED by Sharpe's scams.

Paper meaning the subpoenas plastered all over Trenton and Newark. I gather you didn't bother to show up the day such terms were introduced. Very telling.

No one had to formulate any strategy to "tarnish" Sharpe's legacy, he did a fine job on his own with his poverty, unemployment and crime figures, long before he bowed out in disgrace, following his failure to secure enough legitimate petitions. He did so when he tried to get his greedy hands on that $80 million in PA money, only to have a judge slap his wrist. He did so when he went on a whirlwind tour of the world on a specifically prohibited credit card, drawing on funds from a neglected police department, that his own business administrator stated that he alone controlled. He did so as he was pulling the ECC pension stunt with his partner in crime, Ray Chambers. He did so when he left Newark in a mess that Newark will have to clean up for decades to come, from which the entire region will suffer the residual impact as he moves into obscurity, and hopefully infamy, with the fruit of their sacrifice securely in tow.

No one had to do a damn thing to Sharpe James, he embarrassed himself with his step and fetchit, country roadshow, that he still believes is pulling the wool of Newarks eyes.

As for the legislature, do you really think that anyone believes that they cared what Sharpe did to Newark? All they were concerned with was getting theirs, and not drawing attention to themselves. If Sharpe has a shred of decency left, he'll give them all up as he goes down and give New Jersey a chance to start fresh.

By the way, how does a publicly employed administrator, not know how to spell the word, "publicly?"

J. Sharpe James, J.D.
07-05-2007, 05:56 AM
Too early in the morning to be correcting typos.....

So according to you Newarkers must hate Sharpe for making them all poor?

They never started a recall like the one brewing now.......

They never went to Council meetings blasting the Mayor, administration and Council......

ah....I gotta finish cleaning the ski.....

OneEyeOpen
07-05-2007, 07:13 AM
Too early in the morning to be correcting typos.....

So according to you Newarkers must hate Sharpe for making them all poor?

They never started a recall like the one brewing now.......

They never went to Council meetings blasting the Mayor, administration and Council......

ah....I gotta finish cleaning the ski.....

That's not a typo, you misspelled the word.

Who said Sharpe made all Newarkers poor? You lose what little credit you have for what little sense you've displayed when you try and spin points that way. Simply put, you look like a fool when nothing of the sort was suggested, and the point raised had to do with his double digit poverty, crime and unemployment figures. You can try and duck them all you like, that reality will never change.

As for this idiotic recall, you and I both know it doesn't have a prayer at the requirement of 32,000 voter signatures, so it's nothing more than a stupid stunt designed to get attention, and try to create negative press for a politician that you can't beat on the merits of your arguments, or at the ballot box. You don't have the necessary registered voters, and you never will, even with this desperate attempt to plant that seed. You have NO plan on what to do even if you could get this pathetic stunt rolling, so what exactly is your point? Are you that desperate to be relevant? Putting together a collection of disgruntled malcontents who most likely never deserved their positions is not a difficult task. If only your crowd could have found a way to inspire those disgruntled ex-city employees to educate themselves and actually earn their positions, we wouldn't be here at this point, would we?

Apparently you don't work at a job you actually have to show up for, as there are no shore lines to water, or any other kind of ski from in Newark where you claim to live, and last time I checked, today was a work day.

Enjoy the dole while it lasts, apparently like minds were at that last council meeting, looking for what you clearly believe you're entitled to.

ProSouth
07-10-2007, 12:49 AM
Video: http://lawlib.newark.rutgers.edu/recordings/A_52_04.wmv


Opinion of the Court: http://lawlibrary.rutgers.edu/courts/supreme/a-52-04.opn.html